Retraction: What are the real motives behind the reations of American consumers?

Listening to this retraction, I can’t help but feel a sense of disappointment. The clear images that Mike Daisey portrayed in his original piece were bold and fresh. They made me think. They induced mixed feelings of shock and empathy. They added an obvious reality to the story that made listeners imagine the events, develop sympathy for the workers, and form strong opinions of Apple. But when these stories were proven false and retracted, I notice a sense of frustration brewing inside me.

In my last post, I commented on how jaded Americans were. How we are aware of what is happening in China with the factory workers but have simply accepted this reality and moved on. We support the Apple stock and it has, as a result, just become the most valuable company in U.S. history Read Here. We will still purchase Apple goods despite their unethical manufacturing practices and their exorbitant over-pricing. We hear about it, but it does not necessarily evoke rash behavior – no one is going to throw away their iPhone because it was made by abused Chinese workers. These stories, although moving, do not make us cry or boycott Apple products. I am even writing this blog post on my Macbook Pro.

But what does bring about a strong emotional reaction is the idea that we, as American consumers, were lied to. I do not know whether the reason for this response is that we have developed such a trusting relationship with the media that we feel cheated when lied to, or if we feel foolish because we were willing to accept such horrible occurrences that in the end were not actually the case. Further, are our reactions, as American consumers, based on our genuine concern for the safety of the global community, or are we fixated on self-satisfaction?

It seems to me that a main reason for supporting a cause is the way it makes us feel. I admit that this is a very cynical way of viewing volunteer work, and I understand that the ultimate goal is to better one’s community, or take a stance against injustice. But we cannot ignore the positive affects doing good has on self-worth. When I form an opinion on a subject, and really stand up for that cause, I feel proud and strong and it seems that I can have an affect on the world.

Nevertheless, as pessimistic as this may sound, I question the greater mentality behind American support for this cause overall, the ethics behind Mike Daisey’s originally exaggerated and overzealous presentation, and the genuineness of the reactions to this retraction.


3 thoughts on “Retraction: What are the real motives behind the reations of American consumers?

  1. I can really relate to your third paragraph regarding our naivety in media. As i listened to the story, I believed every detail because I trust that the networks have done their research. Listening to this retraction scared me because it made me think of all of the other ground breaking news stories that I’ve heard, that could potentially turn out to be a collage of skewed facts and blatant lies.

  2. I agree with you in that when we stand up for a cause, it is something that we truly believe in. It is a shame that Daisey will loose many of his initial supporters who wanted to help better Shenzhen and Foxconn just because he fabricated and embellished the truth. It is undeniable that working conditions at Foxconn are sub-par and harsh, and something should be done about it. Unfortunately, this will be twice as hard to get done now that Americans are unsure what to believe any more regarding fact versus fictional information.

  3. I think the main reason why the monologue could not evoke strong dismissal towards Apple brand, like people did towards Nike in the 90s, is because the monologue did not relate any visible effects on the lives of Americans. In fact, Apple outsourcing its production to China means the Americans are losing job. The cash is flowing out to foreign and that doesn’t help the economy here either. And Apple’s suppliers commit a lot of appalling injustices in the far East with the job opportunities that should stay inside the US in the first place. And as a result? American consumers still pay high prices for Apple products. Feels like, “Buy Apple–Fund Atrocities” to me.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s