Retraction Podcast (Analysis and not on underage workers)

After listening to the Retraction podcast on This American Life, I found myself in awe of Mike Daisey.  Not that he is a celebrity, but the change in persona, character, and confidence that I saw between the two  podcasts was drastic.  Obviously, his entire position was being questioned and probed and he was justifiably squirmy and nervous, but the view I had of him before is now completely gone.  I could not believe how poorly he handled the questions about his facts and his monologue.  He did not do himself a service by even coming on to TAL again.  If he was going to he should have had a strong united front and told the people whom had spread his story worldwide that he had made a horrible journalistic mistake and that he should be held accountable for it.  Instead, he came off as selfish and unable to admit the mistake that he most assuredly made.  He went down a slippery slope, and should have taken the approach that TAL did when they found out about the story’s inaccuracies.  They attacked the issue by explaining what went wrong and working hard to show their listeners how it happened and that it won’t again.

            Despite the lies, the fabrications, and the made-up stories, the situation in Shenzhen is unquestionably awful.  If what Mike Daisey was trying to do was to show people across the world that this was going on, then he succeeded.  But he went about it awfully.  He should have let everybody know that his monologue was not a piece of journalism and instead a story with hyperbole that could have been justifiably inserted to bring to light what is a serious problem with the way America’s favorite company makes their revolutionary products.

            The main fabrication that stuck out to me was Mike Daisey’s telling of his running into 12, 13, and 14 year old factory workers outside the gates of the FoxConn workplace.  It has been proven that FoxConn uses 16 and 17 year old underage workers in their factories.  Was that not enough to get people’s attention?  Did he have to harp on the outlandish numbers of 12 and 13 year old workers when even his translator said he never met these people.  For me, this is when Mike Daisey only dug himself deeper in the podcast.  He says that these kids spoke English to him and that either his translator didn’t hear or their English wasn’t good enough for her to understand.  These lies are completely unbelievable to me for they are worse than his original ones.  TAL came out a winner here in a losing situation and Mike Daisey only compounded his mistakes by not being truthful about the hard work that he had actually done.


5 thoughts on “Retraction Podcast (Analysis and not on underage workers)

  1. I couldn’t have said it better myself: “the change in persona, character, and confidence that I saw between the two podcasts was drastic”. After listening to the first podcast, I remember admiring his sense of humor and ability as a storyteller. This second podcast revealed a completely different side, and made me feel a bit duped. He couldn’t have handled the questions more poorly, and it had a humanizing effect. Where as a celebrity would have had an agent telling them how to perfectly answer questions, Mike Daisey was on his own, and only added to his downfall.

  2. I too was dissappointed in Mike Daisey’s actions on the show for the second and third time. He seemed even more confused and unsure of his side of the story than he originally did. I am actually surprised that he choose to come on the show at all and answer questions about his monologue when he knew that they would just be exposing his lies. His responses only created further doubt in my mind for the little bit of credibility he had left.

  3. I agree Sarah. Who are the people around him? There is no doubt that after his Broadway show took off, or even before, that he didn’t have an agent or people near him guiding his career. Daisey did not show any sense of being able to control the damage on his career and instead only compounded his mistakes by not truly owning up to them.

  4. I had a very similar reaction, Mike. I couldn’t believe that in the face of being challenged, Mike Daisey instantly lost all poise that he appeared to have during the first podcast. I agree with, Sarah, too. I really don’t understand why he agreed to go on the show at all. The only reason I can think of is that he thought silence would be the ultimate admission of guilt. It doesn’t look like his attempt to speak out helped him much either, though.

  5. Pingback: Nicola Googles Kathy | Business, Government and Society fiVe

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s